The idea
Software development involves more than writing code. An idea has to survive planning, design, implementation, review, and the handoffs between them.
I’m exploring a venture built around specialist agents that coordinate those stages. A manager carries the brief, a design agent works through the experience, and a developer agent implements the work.
A human stays in the loop
The starting point is an approval-based workflow. Agents can make progress within their role, while important decisions return to the person directing the project.
Clear responsibilities and explicit handoffs matter as much as the individual capabilities of each agent. The goal is useful coordination, rather than a collection of disconnected assistants.
Where it stands
This is an early venture exploration. I’m working through orchestration with OpenMausBot, design workflows with Figma, and development workflows involving GitHub and Antigravity.
The product name, public demo, and launch details are still taking shape. Right now, the focus is making the core workflow useful.
What I’m figuring out
How much context should each agent receive? Which decisions need approval? And how do you know that the result satisfies the original intent?
Those questions guide the next iteration. I want to test the workflow on concrete, bounded projects and document where it helps and where it gets in the way.
This page will grow with the work.